An Embarcadero High Line? Unbuilt SF Show at UC Berkeley
What did I learn from the exhibit in Berkeley.
- The college has an exhibit space at Wurster Hall for shows like this. I should be going there more often.
- Architecture and Urban Planning departments seem to always be in the ugliest building on campus.
- Two genuinely surprising pieces were on display. One exciting one should have been built, the other was more about the process and less about the image on display.
- Taking detailed photography of models and renderings on display in a semi-low light room is no task for an iPhone 4S. I must buy a real camera. My apologies for not providing crisper images.
Exciting - but sadly never "built"The most surprising and exciting display was an audacious 1991 proposal from two architects, Byron Kuth and Liz Ranieri, to retain one single section of the Embarcadero Freeway as a "physical reminder of past planning mistakes." A detailed 3-D model is the main attraction (as seen below). The proposal called for "cutting a hole into the [section] and allowing a redwood tree to emerge."
I saw a piece of the Cypress Freeway structure in Oakland that was preserved for several months to perform tests. Seeing a single section of freeway alone was quite striking, both for knowing the death and physical tragedy of the collapse, but also the odd and hypnotically strange sight of a single section of freeway. If this proposal had been carried out, I believe it would have been beautiful, haunting, and a great reminder of a big planning mistake, not to mention, provide nice views of the Bay.
Too bad the Chronicle never printed their letter. The renderings would have looked more realistic with green redwood trees. All in all, I think this would have really been a great space pointing to the past, much like old city walls in European cities, and pointing to the future with the adaptive reuse of the structure.
Location: The triangle lot of Embarcadero, Howard and Steuart.
Current Use: Asphalt open space.
Yes, that's right, the space that was once a freeway "wall" is nothing today, not even a green plaza. Granted, it's a small triangular lot, so it'd be harder than normal to build there, but I imagine a building or a park could fit in the space nonetheless.
I figured out where it was by noticing the parking structure looking building in the background of the model. Putting together Embarcadero and parking structure, I could only think of the one next to Gap, Inc. headquarters.
|Looking southwest at the corner of Embarcadero and Howard. The Gap Building (left) and the parking garage (right) are fronted by a Steuart Street's cul-de-sac and a small paved triangular parcel. Image: Google Streetview|
|Triangular lot is bottom center. Parking garage is just to right. Image: Bing Maps|
Interestingly, there is a proposal to tear down the parking structure and replace it with a residential high-rise. The proposal includes turning the triangular lot into a park space. Turning asphalt into a park, and a parking garage into more useful housing sounds good to me. At 31 stories tall (348 feet) it may seem a bit too high. Note that nearby towers Rincon Center (342 ft), The Gap Building (275 feet), Steuart Tower (364 feet), and One Embarcadero Center (569 feet) are all the same distance from the waterfront but the same height or taller apart from the Gap Building.
|Image: Paramount Group, Inc.|
|Image: Paramount Group, Inc.|
|Image: Paramount Group, Inc.|
Talking about height. The surprise rendering on display was for the One Rincon Hill towers. One Rincon Hill is the double tower development at the foot of the Bay Bridge that sticks out dramatically. Apparently the original proposal was for two towers, 31 and 26 stories tall. Upon proposal to the Planning Department, planners suggested they build the towers much higher. So we now have 55 and 45 story towers instead. The building design was simply elongated. The height only bothers me somewhat, but you'd think a better design could have been made for such tall buildings. The design created worked better for shorter buildings, even if it was still rather plain.
|Original shorter proposal for One Rincon Hill residential high rises. Image: Urban Life Signs|
Model I most wanted to see when the building was planned
The super slim Renzo Piano Towers. Very few renderings of these towers were published at the time. Although it was great to see the models and some images, they still didn't offer much detail of what they would have been like within the city's skyline. They could have looked just as they are, skinny square stacks.
|Models of the Renzo Piano Towers to be located near the Transbay Tower. Image: Urban Life Signs|
|Renzo Piano Towers in relation to other nearby towers. Note the lack of the Transbay Tower in the drawing. Image: Urban Life Signs|
|Renzo Piano Towers. Image: Urban Life Signs|
|Renzo Piano Towers at First and Mission streets. Image: Urban Life Signs|
Yerba Buena and the Moscone Convention Center - Cesar Pelli's Take
Pelli is getting his big building with the Transbay Tower and Transbay Center, but he once bid for another big San Francisco Project: The Yerba Buena Redevelopment including Moscone Center. Note the gigantically wide and tall tower to have been located on Market Street where the Four Seasons now sits.
|Pelli's proposal for Moscone Center. Howard Street is running from left to right. Image: Urban Life Signs|
|Schematic design of Market Street tower. Note Humboldt Savings Building to the right and outline of future Marriot Hotel to the right in the background. Image: Urban Life Signs|
|Market Street tower by Pelli as seen looking east on Market Street from the corner of Stockton and Market. Image: Urban Life Signs|
First Draft Coit Tower
Shorter, and more "elaborate" with flourishes and details.
|Arthur Brown Jr.'s original proposal for Coit Tower. He was the architect for the final design. Image: Urban Life Signs|
The exhibit space, including a model with a very tall Transamerica Pyramid.
Early 1940s proposal for the Ferry Building. Not too different from what is there today.
When planners considered creating a new Transbay Terminal, they needed to create a realistic vision of what could go there, especially from a use and built form point of view. These images highly informed what was presented by the three architecture firms that submitted designs. Note the green trees on the roof below, a park called "The City Eye." The covered plaza idea is shown in the second image.